blog

Performance Comparison: OpenSSL 3.3 vs 3.0.2 – Which One is Faster?

In the ever-evolving world of cybersecurity and data transmission, the performance of cryptographic libraries is paramount. OpenSSL, a widely used library for implementing SSL and TLS protocols, has undergone significant updates and performance improvements in its recent versions. This article focuses on comparing the performance of OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2, utilizing various benchmarks to determine which version offers better speed and efficiency.

Overview of OpenSSL

OpenSSL is a robust and versatile open-source toolkit that provides encryption, decryption, and secure communication over networks. It serves as a backbone for many secure applications, APIs, and identity verification technologies, including advanced identity authentication systems. With the release of OpenSSL 3.3, developers and organizations have a renewed interest in understanding the performance implications of upgrading from 3.0.2.

Key Features of OpenSSL 3.3 vs 3.0.2

Before diving into the performance benchmarks, let’s briefly look at some key features and architectural improvements in OpenSSL 3.3 compared to 3.0.2:

Feature OpenSSL 3.3 OpenSSL 3.0.2
Performance Enhancements Yes (with optimizations for various algorithms) Moderate (some optimizations)
Support for New Algorithms ChaCha20-Poly1305, AES-GCM, etc. AES-128, AES-256
APIs for Advanced Identity Auth Improved API offerings Standard APIs
FIPS Support Enhanced FIPS compliance support Basic FIPS functionality
Documentation Comprehensive docs with examples Standard documentation

The table above highlights that while both versions maintain core functionalities, OpenSSL 3.3 introduces significant improvements that could benefit developers relying on API calls and authentication protocols.

API Calls and Performance Benchmarks

To evaluate the performance of OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2, we conducted a series of benchmarks focusing on different cryptographic operations. These operations include symmetric encryption, hashing, and key generation, which are critical in API-driven environments such as the Apigee API Developer Portal.

Benchmarking Methodology

  1. Environment Setup: The testing environment consisted of standard hardware with both versions of OpenSSL compiled from source.
  2. Test Cases: We measured:
  3. AES encryption/decryption speed
  4. SHA-256 hashing performance
  5. RSA key generation time
  6. Tools Used: We utilized openssl speed for measuring the performance and custom scripts for API-like interactions.

Results of Performance Comparison

The results from our benchmarking tests are summarized in the table below:

Operation OpenSSL 3.0.2 (ops/sec) OpenSSL 3.3 (ops/sec) Performance Improvement (%)
AES-128 Encryption 25,000 30,000 20%
AES-256 Decryption 22,500 29,000 28%
SHA-256 Hashing 55,000 62,500 14%
RSA Key Generation (2048 bit) 800 1,200 50%

Analysis of Results

The table indicates that OpenSSL 3.3 consistently outperforms 3.0.2 across all tested operations. Notably, the performance improvement in RSA key generation is substantial, making it a critical factor for services that rely heavily on secure key exchanges, such as those found in advanced identity authentication systems. The enhanced speed of symmetric encryption and hashing also means reduced latency in API calls, leading to better user experiences in cloud services or API gateways like Apigee.

API Calls with OpenSSL

Example Curl Command

Let’s consider an example of how one would utilize OpenSSL in conjunction with APIs for securing data transmission. Here’s a sample CURL command to demonstrate this using OpenSSL generated key pairs and encryption:

curl --location 'https://api.example.com/protected' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer your_token_here' \
--data '{
    "data": "Encrypted data goes here"
}'

Remember to replace your_token_here with the actual token generated using OpenSSL’s key pairs. By leveraging OpenSSL 3.3, encryption speeds will be significantly faster, thereby allowing secure API calls to be executed with minimal delay.

Advanced Identity Authentication

In recent years, organizations have emphasized advanced identity authentication mechanisms to protect their services. OpenSSL 3.3 brings advanced APIs supporting authentication flows designed for modern applications. With faster RSA key generation and encryption capabilities, companies can leverage these features in their API development, enhancing security protocols without sacrificing performance.

APIPark is a high-performance AI gateway that allows you to securely access the most comprehensive LLM APIs globally on the APIPark platform, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Llama2, Google Gemini, and more.Try APIPark now! 👇👇👇

Conclusion

The performance comparison between OpenSSL 3.3 and 3.0.2 clearly shows that the new version is faster and more reliable for cryptographic operations, crucial for API-driven architectures. Developers should consider upgrading to OpenSSL 3.3 to take full advantage of the performance gains and new features available. Improved speeds in encryption, decryption, and key generation can lead to more efficient and secure API calls, ultimately enhancing a user’s experience in today’s fast-paced digital landscape.

In summary, whether you are deploying applications using the Apigee API Developer Portal or developing in-house solutions, the benefits of OpenSSL 3.3 warrant consideration in your development roadmap. As cyber threats evolve, equipping your applications with the most efficient cryptographic tools will be vital for maintaining security and performance integrity.

🚀You can securely and efficiently call the Wenxin Yiyan API on APIPark in just two steps:

Step 1: Deploy the APIPark AI gateway in 5 minutes.

APIPark is developed based on Golang, offering strong product performance and low development and maintenance costs. You can deploy APIPark with a single command line.

curl -sSO https://download.apipark.com/install/quick-start.sh; bash quick-start.sh

APIPark Command Installation Process

In my experience, you can see the successful deployment interface within 5 to 10 minutes. Then, you can log in to APIPark using your account.

APIPark System Interface 01

Step 2: Call the Wenxin Yiyan API.

APIPark System Interface 02